Swedish prof builds models to prioritize disease genes, drug targets

An international team of researchers has developed advanced supercomputer models, or digital twins of diseases, to improve diagnosis and treatment. They used one such model to identify the most important disease protein in hay fever. The study underlines the complexity of the disease and the necessity of using the right treatment at the right time. Mikael Benson, professor at Linköping University  CREDIT Thor Balkhed/Linköping University

Why is a drug effective against a certain illness in some individuals, but not in others? With common diseases, medication is ineffective in 40-70 percent of the patients. One reason for this is that diseases are seldom caused by a single “fault” that can be easily treated. Instead, in most diseases, the symptoms are the result of altered interactions between thousands of genes in many different cell types. The timing is also important. Disease processes often evolve over long periods. We are often not aware of disease development until symptoms appear, and diagnosis and treatment are thus often delayed, which may contribute to insufficient medical efficacy.

In a recent study, an international research team aimed to bridge the gap between this complexity and modern health care by constructing computational disease models of the altered gene interactions across many cell types at different time points. The researchers’ long-term goal is to develop such computational models into digital twins of individual patients’ diseases. Such medical digital twins might be used to tailor medication so that each patient could be treated with the right drug at the right time. Ideally, each twin could be matched with and treated with thousands of drugs on the supercomputer, before actual treatment on the patient begins. 

The researchers started by developing methods to construct digital twins of patients with hay fever. They used a technique, single-cell RNA sequencing, to determine all gene activity in each of thousands of individual immune cells – more specifically white blood cells. Since these interactions between genes and cell types may differ between different time points in the same patient, the researchers measured gene activity at different time points before and after stimulating white blood cells with pollen.

To construct supercomputer models of all the data, the researchers used network analyses. Networks can be used to describe and analyze complex systems. For example, a football team could be analyzed as a network based on the passes between the players. The player that passes most to other players during the whole match maybe most important in that network. Similar principles were applied to construct the computer models, or “twins”, as well as to identify the most important disease protein.

In the current study, the researchers found that multiple proteins and signaling cascades were important in seasonal allergies and that these varied greatly across cell types and at different stages of the disease.

­­“We can see that these are extremely complicated changes that occur in different phases of the disease. The variation between different times points means that you have to treat the patient with the right medicine at the right time”, says Dr. Mikael Benson, a professor at Linköping University, who led the study.

Finally, the researchers identified the most important protein in the twin model of hay fever. They show that inhibiting this protein, called PDGF-BB, in experiments with cells was more effective than using a known allergy drug directed against another protein, called IL-4.

 The study also demonstrated that the methods could potentially be applied to give the right treatment at the right time in other immunological diseases, like rheumatism or inflammatory bowel diseases. Clinical implementation will require international collaborations between universities, hospitals, and companies.  

Mizzou prof builds AI for developing new drug therapies

Researchers at the University of Missouri are applying a form of artificial intelligence (AI), previously used to analyze how National Basketball Association (NBA) players move their bodies, to now help scientists develop new drug therapies for medical treatments targeting cancers and other diseases.

The type of AI, called a graph neural network, can help scientists with speeding up the time it takes to sift through large amounts of data generated by studying protein dynamics. This approach can provide new ways to identify target sites on proteins for drugs to work effectively, said Dong Xu, a Curators' Distinguished Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the MU College of Engineering and one of the study’s authors. Dong Xu

“Previously, drug designers may have known about a couple of places on a protein’s structure to target with their therapies,” said Xu, who is also the Paul K. and Dianne Shumaker Professor in bioinformatics. “A novel outcome of this method is that we identified a pathway between different areas of the protein structure, which could potentially allow scientists who are designing drugs to see additional possible target sites for delivering their targeted therapies. This can increase the chances that the therapy may be successful.”

Xu said they can also simulate how proteins can change to different conditions, such as the development of cancer, and then use that information to infer their relationships with other bodily functions.

“With machine learning, we can really study what are the important interactions within different areas of the protein structure,” Xu said. “Our method provides a systematic review of the data involved when studying proteins, as well as a protein’s energy state, which could help when identifying any possible mutation’s effect. This is important because protein mutations can enhance the possibility of cancers and other diseases developing in the body.”

Surrey team shows quantum mechanics explains why DNA can spontaneously mutate

The molecules of life, DNA, replicate with astounding precision, yet this process is not immune to mistakes and can lead to mutations. Using sophisticated supercomputer modeling, a team of physicists and chemists at the University of Surrey have shown that such errors in copying can arise due to the strange rules of the quantum world.  Getty

The two strands of the famous DNA double helix are linked together by subatomic particles called protons – the nuclei of atoms of hydrogen – which provide the glue that bonds molecules called bases together. These so-called hydrogen bonds are like the rungs of a twisted ladder that makes up the double helix structure discovered in 1952 by James Watson and Francis Crick based on the work of Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins.  

Normally, these DNA bases (called A, C, T, and G) follow strict rules on how they bond together: A always bonds to T and C always to G. This strict pairing is determined by the molecules' shape, fitting them together like pieces in a jigsaw, but if the nature of the hydrogen bonds changes slightly, this can cause the pairing rule to break down, leading to the wrong bases being linked and hence a mutation. Although predicted by Crick and Watson, it is only now that sophisticated computational modeling has been able to quantify the process accurately. 

The team, part of Surrey's research program in the exciting new field of quantum biology, has shown that this modification in the bonds between the DNA strands is far more prevalent than has hitherto been thought. The protons can easily jump from their usual site on one side of an energy barrier to land on the other side. If this happens just before the two strands are unzipped in the first step of the copying process, then the error can pass through the replication machinery in the cell, leading to what is called a DNA mismatch and, potentially, a mutation.  

The Surrey team based in the Leverhulme Quantum Biology Doctoral Training Centre used an approach called open quantum systems to determine the physical mechanisms that might cause the protons to jump across between the DNA strands. But, most intriguingly, it is thanks to a well-known yet almost magical quantum mechanism called tunneling – akin to a phantom passing through a solid wall – that they manage to get across.  

It had previously been thought that such quantum behavior could not occur inside a living cell's warm, wet and complex environment. However, the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger had suggested in his 1944 book What is Life? that quantum mechanics can play a role in living systems since they behave rather differently from inanimate matter. This latest work seems to confirm Schrödinger's theory.   

In their study, the authors determine that the local cellular environment causes the protons, which behave like spread-out waves, to be thermally activated and encouraged through the energy barrier. The protons are found to be continuously and very rapidly tunneling back and forth between the two strands. Then, when the DNA is cleaved into its separate strands, some of the protons are caught on the wrong side, leading to an error. 

Dr. Louie Slocombe, who performed these calculations during his Ph.D., explained: “The protons in the DNA can tunnel along with the hydrogen bonds in DNA and modify the bases which encode the genetic information. The modified bases are called "tautomers" and can survive the DNA cleavage and replication processes, causing "transcription errors" or mutations.” 

Dr. Slocombe's work at the Surrey's Leverhulme Quantum Biology Doctoral Training Centre was supervised by Prof Jim Al-Khalili (Physics, Surrey) and Dr. Marco Sacchi (Chemistry, Surrey) and published in Communications Physics. 

Prof Al-Khalili commented: “Watson and Crick speculated about the existence and importance of quantum mechanical effects in DNA well over 50 years ago, however, the mechanism has been largely overlooked.”  

Dr. Sacchi continued: “Biologists would typically expect tunneling to play a significant role only at low temperatures and in relatively simple systems. Therefore, they tended to discount quantum effects in DNA. With our study, we believe we have proved that these assumptions do not hold.”